Defensible AI governance for your firm.

Firms where AI is already in use and someone, a GC, a risk partner, a CIO, is the one who has to answer for it. Most of our users sit in the 50–1,500 lawyer range, in jurisdictions that have started writing rules (US, EU, Canada, UK). If nobody at your firm is being asked AI questions yet, you don't need us yet.

We import them as-is, version them, and map each section to the obligations it covers. You'll see exactly which clauses satisfy which rules and where the gaps are. We don't rewrite your policy. Your reviewers approve every change through the same workflow they already use for any firm policy.

Whichever offices and bars you practice in. Today that includes ABA Opinion 512, the FLSC Model Code, the Barreau du Québec guide, the SRA Standards, the EU AI Act, Germany's BRAO, and France's RIN. Activity captured in an office is attributed to the rules that govern it, so a New York matter and a London matter sit under different obligations automatically.

A week of real work, not a quarter of integration. SSO, the desktop agent, and the Chrome extension go in on day one. From there you map offices, jurisdictions, monitored individuals, and reviewers. Your compliance lead drives it; we sit in the working sessions and clear blockers in real time.

Your tenant is isolated, hosted in the region you choose, and nothing crosses the boundary unless you ask it to. Model calls run with provider training disabled, captures are sanitized before any analysis, and access is scoped per-firm. No model is trained on your data, by us or by anyone we route to.

Twenty minutes on a call. We walk your jurisdictions, offices, and the tools your people are already using, then send a scoped pilot. Pilots run against real activity so the answer to "is this worth it" comes from your own data, not a deck.